MEDDPICC competence model: what good application looks like
Seven connected competencies describe how a seller and a manager apply MEDDPICC in real work, so leaders assess people against one standard, coach to specific gaps and see movement over time.
Free, no sign-up. PDF, one A4 page.
What a MEDDPICC competence model is
A competence model describes what competent MEDDPICC application looks like in the job. Seven connected competencies describe how a seller and a manager apply MEDDPICC in real work, so leaders assess people against one standard, coach to specific gaps and see movement over time.
Each competency draws on specific MEDDPICC elements. For each one, the model sets out what a seller and a manager do at level 3, the target.
Competence assessment versus deal qualification
Deal scoring rubric
What evidence do we have for this opportunity? How reliable is it? What is missing, and what does that mean for the deal strategy?
Competence model
Can the seller apply MEDDPICC in practice? Can they ask useful questions, distinguish evidence from opinion and connect what they learn to the next action? Can the manager coach it?
The model sits beside a separate deal scoring rubric: that rubric evaluates an opportunity’s evidence, this model evaluates a person. A well-filled deal record does not, on its own, demonstrate seller competence.
Seven competencies, for sellers and managers
What a seller and a manager do at level 3 in each competency, and the MEDDPICC elements it draws on.
Discovery and diagnosis
Metrics · Implicate the pain
Establishes the buyer’s problem, impact and underlying cause through a natural conversation. Tests assumptions, checks the desired outcome and records what is confirmed and what needs further investigation.
Inspects discovery evidence and challenges vague conclusions. Diagnoses the seller’s skill gap, coaches specific questions or behaviours and checks whether the next interaction improves the diagnosis.
Value quantification and business cases
Metrics · Pain · Decision criteria · Economic buyer
Agrees relevant measures and desired outcomes with the buyer. Quantifies value with explicit assumptions, identifies who must validate it, and connects your contribution to a credible business case.
Tests the commercial logic and evidence behind value claims. Coaches the seller to validate important assumptions with the right buyer and checks that the business case informs the deal strategy.
Stakeholder and champion development
Economic buyer · Champion · Decision process
Maps influence and authority for the decision. Tests champion behaviour, builds appropriate access, and agrees actions to address missing stakeholders without relying solely on titles or assurances.
Challenges the evidence for authority, influence and advocacy. Coaches a realistic access and alignment plan, uses senior support deliberately and follows up whether stakeholder behaviour supports the assessment.
Solution framing and differentiation
Decision criteria · Competition · Metrics · Pain
Frames your solution against confirmed problems, value and decision criteria. Uses relevant proof, checks the buyer’s response and addresses alternatives with supported claims and clear fit limitations.
Reviews solution conversations against buyer evidence and decision criteria. Coaches relevant framing and proof, challenges unsupported claims and checks whether later buyer feedback confirms fit or exposes a gap.
Buying-process progression
Decision process · Paper process · Economic buyer · Champion
Establishes the relevant decision and contracting steps, owners and dependencies. Agrees useful next commitments with the buyer, checks readiness to progress and escalates gaps before they create avoidable delay.
Inspects buyer commitments and process dependencies, challenges unsupported stage progress and coaches actions to resolve blockers. Coordinates internal support and checks whether agreed next steps actually occur.
Qualification and deal judgement
All eight elements
Assesses deal evidence against the agreed standard, challenges unsupported claims and prioritises material risks. Explains whether to progress, investigate or qualify out, with justified next actions and a supported forecast rationale.
Runs evidence-based deal reviews, challenges seller and AI conclusions and distinguishes deal risk from a capability gap. Agrees prioritised actions, tests forecast assumptions and checks evidence of change at the next review.
Execution and follow-through
All eight · especially decision and paper process
Keeps evidence and commitments current, coordinates required colleagues and closes or renegotiates actions. Uses coaching and tools critically, checks what changed and makes the next owner and step clear.
Protects a regular review and coaching cadence, follows up commitments and removes barriers to application. Samples real work, gives specific feedback and checks whether practice improves without unnecessary administrative burden.
Four levels. Level 3 is the target.
Foundation
Explains and recognises.
Developing
Applies with guidance.
Competent
Applies independently and consistently.
The targetAdvanced
Adapts to complexity. Not required to be competent.
Level 3 means applying MEDDPICC independently and consistently. That is what competent looks like in the job. Level 4 describes adapting to complexity, and is not required to be competent.
The full model holds four levels per competency and the evidence an assessor looks for at each one. That ladder is built with your team in the Design phase so it describes your buyers, deals and language.
Self-assessment, manager assessment and observed work
Self-assessment
Each seller self-scores before training, to set a baseline.
Manager assessment
Their manager scores them against the same standard. The gap between the two scores shows where to start coaching.
Observed work
Managers sample real work, such as deal reviews and buyer conversations, and give specific feedback.
Scores are repeated at one and three months after training. The gap between self and manager scores, and the movement over time, drive each person’s coaching plan. The same seven competencies shape the training, so what is taught is what is assessed.
One competency, assessed
A seller, assessed on buying-process progression
- Competency
- Buying-process progression
- Self-assessment
- Level 3, Competent
- Manager assessment
- Level 2, Developing
- Observed work
- In a deal review the seller says, “They want to sign this month.” The notes do not contain buyer-confirmed decision steps or owners.
- Coaching focus
- Establish the relevant decision and contracting steps, owners and dependencies with the buyer, and check readiness to progress.
- Next review
- Score again at one month, using the next deal review as evidence of change.
Descriptions set expectations for the role, not findings about anyone’s current performance.
Download the one-page model
The one-page PDF shows all seven competencies with seller and manager expectations at level 3, the four levels and how the model is used. Free, no sign-up.
This is Closing Foundry’s model for applying MEDDPICC. It is not an official MEDDPICC standard or accreditation. The one-page view is a level-3 overview, not the full four-level assessment rubric.
Discuss a model tailored to your team
The full four-level ladder is built with your team in the Design phase of our MEDDPICC training, so it describes your buyers, deals and language. It sits beside a separate deal scoring rubric.
More on MEDDPICC: the MEDDPICC hub.