Key Points

‍

- MEDDPICC is a qualification framework, not your process or method. Use it with (1) your sales process (what to do) and (2) your sales method (how to do it). Together they form your sales‑execution system.

‍

- Qualification discipline drives outcomes. Well‑qualified deals win 6.3× more often and close 21.6% faster; only 36% of post‑Discovery deals carry a score and notes, fuel for misses and slippage.

‍

- MEDDPICC is dynamic, not a checklist. Each letter evolves as the buyer’s reality changes. Treat it as a live model you update continuously.

‍

- Applied correctly, it improves forecast accuracy. Commit only deals with buyer‑evidence across the letters; move deals backwards when evidence weakens.

‍

- Avoid the “seller interrogation” trap. Use buyer‑centred questions and quantify current & future state to prevent MEDDPICC from feeling one sided.

‍

- LLMs can remove the inspection burden. Automating deal‑by‑deal MEDDPICC checks means rigour across all pipeline, not just “big bets.”

‍

‍

‍

How to use MEDDPICC to de‑risk deals, direct next best actions, and improve forecast confidence, without turning qualification into an interrogation.

‍

What MEDDPICC is, and what it isn’t

‍

MEDDPICC (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Paper Process, Implicate the Pain, Champion, Competition) is one of the most widely adopted sales qualification frameworks for complex B2B sales. It originated at PTC in the mid‑1990s and has since evolved (MEDDIC → MEDDICC → MEDDPICC) to reflect modern buying, especially the realities of cloud procurement and stiffer competition.

‍

It forms 1 of 3 key pillars of B2B sales execution:

‍

  • Sales Process = what to do to support the buyer’s journey.
  • Sales Method = how to do it (e.g., how to run discovery).
  • Sales Qualification (MEDDPICC) = why this deal is safe to pursue and what to do next. Think of it as a deal sat‑nav: it de‑risks the opportunity and directs next best actions.

‍

Two vital cautions:

  1. Not a silver bullet. MEDDPICC won’t win the deal for you; it gives you the truth about the deal so you can act wisely.
  2. Buyer‑centred or bust. Used poorly, it feels like seller centric box ticking. Used well, it helps the buyer make a good decision by clarifying value, path, and risk.

‍

Why qualification discipline matters now

‍

Recent data from Ebsta is blunt: well‑qualified deals are 6.3× more likely to close and 21.6% faster, and strong qualification halves the risk of slippage. Yet only 36% of opportunities that pass Discovery include both a score and supporting notes, creating forecast blind spots and wasted effort.

‍‍

Implication for founders & CROs: Make MEDDPICC a continuous practice, not a one‑time gate. Build inspection into your operating rhythm and tooling so the forecast is built on buyer evidence, not optimism.

‍

The letters, explained

‍

M - Metrics

‍

What it is. Quantified business impact that justifies change and anchors value. Aim beyond generic ROI: tie the customer’s numbers to their goals.

‍

How to use it. Build from M1 → M2 → M3 (reference benchmarks → customer‑specific baseline & impact → executive‑level value narrative). Link metrics directly to Decision Criteria and to the payoff in your proposal.

‍

Watch outs. Vague multipliers (“we’ll save 20%”) erode trust; quantify current and future state, and ensure your champion agrees to the numbers.

‍

E - Economic Buyer

‍

What it is. The person with final authority to spend. Meeting them is a leading indicator of deal quality.

‍

How to use it. Meet the EB (live or video) to validate value, budget, and risk; triangulate with your champion; confirm who signs and their criteria. Course data emphasises: winners meet the EB; slipped deals often didn’t.

‍

Watch outs. Email approvals ≠ EB buy‑in. Don’t chase an EB until M is credible and your Champion can set the context.

‍

D - Decision Criteria

‍

What it is. The formal & informal yardsticks used to judge options; they evolve. Your job is to shape criteria around the metrics and risk that matter.

‍

How to use it. Capture written criteria; map them to your differentiators; address each criterion with evidence (proof, references, security attestations). Align multi‑stakeholder needs to avoid late “no‑decision.”

‍

Watch outs. Static criteria are fiction. Re‑confirm after each senior meeting; keep the list current.

‍

D - Decision Process

‍

What it is. The sequence of steps the buyer must run to say “yes.” Start with who signs, then work backwards to technical validation, business case, approvals, and calendared milestones (mutual plan).

‍

How to use it. Build a mutual action plan with named owners and dates. Use it to drive next steps and to set forecast confidence. Move deals back if a step slips.

‍

Watch outs. Process ≠ progress; insist on observable buyer actions (e.g., “InfoSec review scheduled”) before advancing stages.

‍

P - Paper Process

‍

What it is. The contracting gauntlet: vendor set‑up, legal, InfoSec, data processing, procurement, budget release. In modern SaaS, this is a top slippage driver.

‍

How to use it. Start early. Document the exact steps, required artefacts, and standard terms; identify redlines; run streams in parallel where possible. Use your champion to pre wire legal & security.

‍

Watch outs. “We didn’t think legal would be a problem” is a forecast killer. Don’t commit a deal without a visible paper path.

‍

I - Implicate the Pain

‍

What it is. Making the business impact of the problem real enough to motivate change. The goal is clarity, not manipulation.

‍

How to use it. Quantify the Cost of Inaction and connect it to Metrics and Decision Criteria. Keep language neutral and buyer‑centred.

‍

Watch outs. Don’t “manufacture” pain; help buyers articulate it and agree it’s worth fixing now.

‍

C - Champion

‍

What it is. An insider who sells for you. Look for the 3 I’s: Incentive, Influence, Insight. No true champion, no real deal.

‍

How to use it. Test champions with small “proof tasks” (introductions, data sharing, timeline commits). Equip them with a concise internal narrative (problem → approach → payoff → investment path).

‍

Watch outs. Don’t confuse a friendly guide with a champion; score them and colour‑code the strength. Multi‑thread to reduce single‑point failure.

‍

C - Competition

‍

What it is. Any alternative for budget/time: vendors, do‑nothing, build‑it, or competing internal projects.

‍

How to use it. Map alternatives explicitly; position your unique proof against the buyer’s decision criteria; raise “do‑nothing” risk using the Metrics/COI you’ve agreed.

‍

Watch outs. If you can’t name the alternatives, you’re being outsold.

‍

Putting MEDDPICC to work

‍

Make it continuous. MEDDPICC isn’t a form you fill once; it’s a shared language you update as new buyer facts emerge. Treat the letters as dynamic fields in your CRM / digital sales room.

‍

Inspect what you expect. Build a weekly deal inspection where managers coach via the letters: What’s the latest for M? Have we met E? Is P underway? Tie inspection to forecast categories.

‍

Instrument the work. Many platforms now embed MEDDPICC so reps can score, note, and track each letter beside the opportunity. That reduces cognitive lift and enables consistent application across all pipeline, not just big bets.

‍

Let evidence drive the forecast. Commit only deals with strong buyer‑side signals across the letters; downgrade or move back when evidence weakens. This is how MEDDPICC contributes to ±10% forecast accuracy.

‍

Common mistakes

‍

  • Treating it like a checklist. Guardrail: treat letters as living hypotheses you must keep validating.
  • ‍
  • Interrogation vibe. Guardrail: ask buyer‑centred questions tied to their outcomes; avoid “qualifying for me” framing.
  • ‍
  • Over‑focusing on “M & P” too narrowly. Guardrail: go deeper on current vs. future state and tie to Decision Criteria to correct superficial use.
  • ‍
  • Ignoring Paper Process. Guardrail: surface legal/security steps early; build them into the mutual plan.
  • ‍
  • Single‑threading through a “guide.” Guardrail: test champions and multi‑thread.

‍

Implementation quick start

‍

  1. Define the letters in your context (what “good” evidence looks like). Socialise examples from won/lost deals.
  2. Embed MEDDPICC fields, scoring, and notes in CRM / sales room; make stage exits depend on buyer evidence.
  3. Coach weekly via the letters and run a monthly “slippage review” focused on Paper Process and Decision gaps.
  4. Automate prompts with your copilot/LLM to scan emails, calls, and notes, flagging missing letters and suggesting next best actions.
  5. Measure: track qualification completeness, slippage, win rate, and forecast misses. Expect uplift as qualification depth rises.

‍

Bottom line

‍

MEDDPICC won’t sell for you, but it will tell you the truth. Used as part of a buyer‑centred execution system (process + method + qualification), it de‑risks deals, focuses effort, and makes your forecast more reliable. The data is clear: teams that qualify continuously win more, faster, with fewer surprises.

See your sales gaps, then fix them

Book a free 30 min Sales Readiness Score review and get your 30 day plan.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Insights

Low, cinematic sweep with a cylindrical pin in a V-block and a single scanning beam across centre mass.
Start-Up
Forecast accuracy

Forecast accuracy: the founder’s discipline (and how to reach ±10%)

July 15, 2025
Socket set with one chosen
Start-Up
Forecast accuracy

When & How to Hire Your First Sales Leader

June 10, 2025
Extreme-detail cinematic macro photograph of a brushed-stainless go/no-go plug gauge partially inserted into a ring gauge, suspended 10–15 mm above a partially unrolled navy blueprint sheet on a clean light-grey desk
Start-Up
Win-rate lift

Win rate is the cleanest signal of sales health for a start‑up

August 13, 2025